So what is Aave all about? How was it able to go from 0 to $3B in total value locked in less than a year? And what’s the use case for the AAVE token? You’ll find answers to these questions in this article. 

Let’s start from the beginning.  

ETHLend 

The initial version of Aave – which is currently one of the most popular lending protocols in decentralized finance – came into existence in 2017. Before the rebranding that happened later in September 2018, the project was known as ETHLend. 

ETHLend was started in Finland by Stani Kulechov. Stani, a law degree graduate, discovered Ethereum, realised the power of smart contracts and decided to build a peer-to-peer lending protocol. 

Finland was clearly not a usual location for a new tech company, with the majority of other crypto firms launching in venture-capital-rich places such as Silicon Valley, New York, London, Hong Kong or Singapore. 

This also shows one of the most interesting properties of decentralized finance. In contrast to traditional finance where a new fintech startup requires a lot of capital and staff just to comply with all the banking regulations, a new defi project can be launched by even a single person with not a lot of upfront capital needed.

The first version of ETHLend was deployed to the Ethereum mainnet in early 2017 and started attracting interest in the Ethereum community. 

ICO and Rebranding 

Stani saw the potential of decentralized lending and decided to raise money via an initial coin offering (ICO) at the end of 2017 to fund further development of ETHLend. As we mentioned earlier funding a project outside of typical venture capital locations can be quite challenging. However, the ICO model allows everyone in the world to participate.

ETHLend was able to raise $16.2M which was quite moderate considering the craziness of the 2017 ICO mania. 

The ICO allowed for hiring more developers who were able to focus on making improvements to the protocol throughout 2018. This was all despite the native ETHLend token – LEND – losing most of its value in the post-ICO era. 

The ETHLend team soon realised that the peer-to-peer lending model of the protocol was becoming more and more problematic.

In the peer-to-peer model, users interact with other users via smart contracts. This can be quite inefficient especially if there is no one on the other side who wants to interact with us. 

A lot of other projects, such as Uniswap and Compound, that came into existence at the end of 2018, started leveraging another model – peer-to-contract. 

The peer-to-contract model is based on a contract with pooled funds that can be instantly used by the users of the protocol. This eliminates the wait time necessary to find a counterparty and makes the whole process of interacting with a decentralized protocol smoother. 

This was also the time when the team behind ETHLend decided to change their model from peer-to-peer to peer-to-contract and rebrand from ETHLend to Aave. 

Aave

The name Aave comes from Finnish where it means “a ghost”. This is also why we can now see a friendly ghost in the Aave’s logo. 

When it comes to the protocol itself, Aave users can become depositors or borrowers. Depositors provide funds to borrowers in return for interest on their deposit. Borrowers are willing to pay interest on the amount they borrowed in exchange for having a lump sum of money available immediately.

Users can, for example, supply a stable coin such as DAI and start generating interest according to the DAI supply interest rate. This is determined by the ratio between supplied and borrowed DAI.

The supplied DAI can then be used by borrowers. Borrowers have to supply collateral, for example, ETH to be able to borrow other tokens. All the standard loans in Aave are overcollateralized which means that the value of supplied collateral is higher than the amount that can be borrowed. This protects the protocol from being undercollateralized and not being able to repay depositors. 

In this model, depositors basically provide liquidity to the protocol, this is also why Aave is very often described as a decentralised liquidity market protocol.  

On top of variable interest rates, Aave also offers stable borrow rates which is a distinctive feature not present in other popular lending defi protocols, such as Compound. 

In Aave, depositors who provide funds to a smart contract receive aTokens. The value of aTokens is pegged to the value of the underlying token at a 1:1 ratio. What is interesting is that the balance of aTokens represents their deposited amount plus the accrued interest and it keeps increasing according to the current borrow interest rate of the protocol. Also, aTokens are just ERC20 tokens. This means you can basically send them to someone else and the balance of their aTokens will keep increasing in their wallet automatically, which is pretty cool. 

If you want to learn more about how exactly lending works in defi and why is it even needed in the first place, check out our other article that covers this topic in depth. 

Another important concept popularised by Aave is flash loans. 

Flash Loans

A flash loan is a feature that allows you to borrow any available amount of assets from a designated smart contract pool with no upfront collateral needed. The caveat is that a flash loan has to be borrowed and repaid within the same blockchain transaction. 

These constructs are useful building blocks in DeFi as they can be used for things like arbitrage, swapping collateral and self-liquidation.

Fortunately enough, we also wrote a separate article that explains the mechanics of flash loans and you can check it out here. 

DeFi Summer

After a couple of years of work, Aave launched on the Ethereum mainnet at the beginning of 2020 and started building users’ interest and its total value locked (TVL) in the protocol. 

This quickly escalated in May 2020 when a period of DeFi super-growth also called DeFi Summer started. 

Before DeFi Summer, the total value locked in Aave, which is one of the key metrics when it comes to a lending protocol, was at around $40M. 

With launches of new DeFi protocols and new yield farming opportunities, Aave’s TVL started rising dramatically. 

$60M in June, $400M in July. August was closed with a whopping $1.5B in TVL. This number remained at $1.5B in September despite the cool down across the whole DeFi space. Although October saw a drop back to around $1B, at the end of November we were once again at an all-time high with $1.6B locked. At the end of 2020, Aave’s TVL was touching $2B. In 2021, a major surge in DeFi tokens pushed Aave’s TVL to over $3B by mid-January.

This is basically a 50x increase in TVL in around 6 months – quite astonishing. 

Besides that, Aave hit another major milestone – $1B in flash loans volume. 

Additionally, there were a few other important events that took place during DeFi Summer. 

Aave raised $3M from venture capital firms: Three Arrow Capital and Framework Ventures who purchased Aave’s native token LEND. 

In July 2020 Aave was granted an electronic money license by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority. This strategic move will make it possible for Aave to become a fiat gateway and easily onboard people to its own protocol. 

On top of this, also in July, Aave announced an upgrade to the tokenomics of the protocol conveniently named Aavenomics. 

Aavenomics

Aavenomics aimed at making Aave more decentralized by allowing token holders to participate in the governance of the protocol.

Some of the most important elements of the upgrade were the migration from the LEND token to a new token AAVE in a 100:1 ratio, new Ecosystem Incentives and the Safety Module.

The Safety Module allows for staking AAVE tokens and acts as insurance against a potential shortfall event. If an event like this occurs, up to 30% of the tokens staked in the safety module could be slashed and would provide a way to repay everyone affected. 

Although major shortfall events are unlikely, they can still happen. An example of such an event would be if a popular stable coin loses its peg to the US dollar. 

In exchange for staking their tokens users receive staking rewards in the form of additional AAVE tokens. Currently, the rewards are at around 6% annually and are generated from the protocol fees.  

The token migration was initiated in October 2020 and went smoothly with most of the LEND holders exchanging their tokens in the first couple of weeks. 

So far, we’ve seen 7 Aave Improvement Proposals (AIPs). Most of the proposals involve either adding a new asset as collateral or tweaking some of the risk parameters of the already existing tokens that can be used in the protocol.

V2

In the meantime, The Aave team was relentlessly working on delivering an upgraded version of the protocol. 

Aave V2 went live in December 2020 and brought a lot of new features and improvements such as:

Collateral Swap. Users can swap their collateral from one token to the other. For example, they can swap their collateral from ETH to DAI if they believe that ETH may lose value in the future. Collateral Swap is possible thanks to flash loans and it was explained in our article about flash loans. 

Batch Flash Loans. Users can now flash borrow multiple assets at the same time, all of it within the same Ethereum transaction. 

Debt Tokenization. In V2, borrowers receive tokens that represent their debt. This in turn enables another feature:

Native Credit Delegation. This allows for opening up access to liquidity without providing collateral. A very useful feature that can be used, for example, to provide a credit line to an institution, a cryptocurrency exchange or even other decentralized protocol under certain conditions. This feature in and of itself is probably worth writing another article. 

Besides all of that, V2 contracts are highly optimised which results in lower gas fees. In some cases, a user can save up to 50% of the gas cost when comparing to V1.

Future 

Aave is clearly one of the most important protocols in the decentralised finance space and there is a big chance it will remain one of the main building blocks in defi for the foreseeable future. 

One of the strong aspects of Aave is its community, also known as Aavengers, with a lot of members supporting the protocol pretty much from the time of their ICO. 

Due to Ethereum’s popularity, interacting with Aave and other defi protocols can be quite expensive, especially when working with small amounts of money. 

To solve this issue, Aave, similarly to other major defi protocols, is also exploring the possibility of launching on layer 2. This should make decentralized lending and borrowing even more accessible to everyone. 

So what do you think about Aave? How big will it become in the future? 

If you enjoyed reading this article you can also check out Finematics on Youtube and Twitter.

So have you ever been wondering how lending and borrowing works in DeFi? How are the supply and borrow rates determined? And what is the main difference between the most popular lending protocols such as Compound and Aave? We’ll answer all of these questions in this article. 

What is Lending and Borrowing

Let’s start with what lending and borrowing is. 

Lending and borrowing is one of the most important element of any financial system. Most people at some point in their life are exposed to borrowing, usually by taking a student loan, a car loan or a mortgage. 

The whole concept is quite simple. Lenders a.k.a. depositors provide funds to borrowers in return for interest on their deposit. Borrowers or loan takers are willing to pay interest on the amount they borrowed in exchange for having a lump sum of money available immediately.

Traditionally, lending and borrowing is facilitated by a financial institution such as a bank or a peer-to-peer lender. 

When it comes to short term lending & borrowing, the area of traditional finance that specializes in it is called the money market. The money market provides access to multiple instruments such as CDs (certificates of deposits), Repos (repurchase-agreements), Treasury Bills and others. 

Lending and Borrowing in Crypto 

In the cryptocurrency space, lending and borrowing is accessible either through DeFi protocols such as Aave or Compound or by CeFi companies, for instance, BlockFi or Celsius.

CeFi or centralized finance operates in a very similar way to how banks operate. This is also why sometimes we call these companies “crypto banks”. BlockFi, for example, takes custody over deposited assets and lends them out to either institutional players such as market makers or hedge funds or to the other users of their platform.

Although the centralized lending model works just fine, it is susceptible to the same problems as centralized crypto exchanges – mainly losing customer deposits by either being hacked or other forms of negligence (bad loans, insider job etc.). 

You can also argue that the CeFi model basically goes against one of the main value propositions of cryptocurrencies – self-custody of your assets. 

This is also where DeFi lending comes into play. 

Lending and Borrowing in DeFi

DeFi lending allows users to become lenders or borrowers in a completely decentralized and permissionless way while maintaining full custody over their coins. 

DeFi lending is based on smart contracts that run on open blockchains, predominantly Ethereum. This is also why DeFi lending, in contrast to CeFi lending, is accessible to everyone without a need of providing your personal details or trusting someone else to hold your funds. 

Aave and Compound are two main lending protocols available in DeFi. Both of the protocols work by creating money markets for particular tokens such as ETH, stable coins like DAI and USDC or other tokens like LINK or wrapped BTC.

Users, who want to become lenders, supply their tokens to a particular money market and start receiving interest on their tokens according to the current supply APY. 

The supplied tokens are sent to a smart contract and become available for other users to borrow. In exchange for the supplied tokens, the smart contract issues other tokens that represent the supplied tokens plus interest. These tokens are called cTokens in Compound and aTokens in Aave and they can be redeemed for the underlying tokens. We’ll dive deeper into their mechanics later in this article. 

It’s also worth mentioning that in DeFi, at the moment, pretty much all of the loans are overcollateralized. This means that a user who wants to borrow funds has to supply tokens in the form of collateral that is worth more than the actual loan that they want to take. 

At this point, you may ask the question – what’s the point of taking a loan if you have to supply tokens that are worth more than the actual amount of the loan taken. Why wouldn’t someone just sell their tokens in the first place? 

There are quite a few reasons for this. Mainly, the users don’t want to sell their tokens but they need funds to cover unexpected expenses. Other reasons include avoiding or delaying paying capital gain taxes on their tokens or using borrowed funds to increase their leverage in a certain position. 

So, is there a limit on how much can be borrowed? 

Yes. The amount that can be borrowed depends on 2 main factors. 

The first one – how much funds are available to be borrowed in a particular market. This is usually not a problem in active markets unless someone is trying to borrow a really big amount of tokens.

The second one – what is the collateral factor of supplied tokens. Collateral factor determines how much can be borrowed based on the quality of the collateral. DAI and ETH, for example, have a collateral factor of 75% on Compound. This means that up to 75% of the value of the supplied DAI or ETH can be used to borrow other tokens. 

If a user decides to borrow funds, the value of the borrowed amount must always stay lower than the value of their collateral times its collateral factor. If this condition holds there is no limit on how long a user can borrow funds for.

If the value of the collateral falls below the required collateral level, the user would have their collateral liquidated in order for the protocol to repay the borrowed amount.

The interest that lenders receive and the interest, that borrowers have to pay are determined by the ratio between supplied and borrowed tokens in a particular market. 

The interest that is paid by borrowers is the interest earned by lenders, so the borrow APY is higher than the supply APY in a particular market.

The interest APYs are calculated per Ethereum block. Calculating APYs per block means that DeFi lending provides variable interest rates that can change quite dramatically depending on the lending and borrowing demand for particular tokens. 

This is also where one of the biggest differences between Compound and Aave comes in. Although both protocols offer variable supply and borrow APYs, Aave also offers stable borrow APY. Stable APY is fixed in a short-term, but it can change in the long-term to accommodate changes in the supply/demand ratio between tokens. 

On top of stable APY, Aave also offers flash loans where users can borrow funds with no upfront collateral for a very short period of time – one Ethereum transaction. More on the flash loans here. 

To better understand how the DeFi lending protocols work, let’s dive into an example.

How Does It Work

Let’s dive deeper into the mechanics of Compound and cTokens. 

In our example, a user deposits 10 ETH into Compound. In exchange for 10 ETH, Compound issues cTokens in this case cETH. 

How many cETH tokens will the user receive? This depends on the current exchange rate for a particular market, in this case, ETH. When a new market is created the exchange rate between cTokens and underlying tokens is set to 0.02. This is an arbitrary number, but we can assume that each market starts at 0.02. We can also assume that this exchange rate can only increase with each Ethereum block. 

If the user supplied 10 ETH when the market was just created they would’ve received 10/0.02=500 cETH. Because the ETH market has been operating for a while we can assume that the exchange rate is already higher. Let’s say it is 0.021. 

This means that the user would receive 10/0.021=~476.19 cETH. If the user decided to immediately redeem their ETH, they should receive roughly the same amount as it was deposited, which is around 10 ETH. 

Now, here is when the magic happens. The user holds their cETH.  This is just another ERC20 token and can be sent anywhere. The main difference is that cETH is necessary to redeem the underlying ETH from Compound. On top of that, cETH keeps accumulating interest, even if it is sent from the original wallet that initiated the deposit to another wallet. 

With each Ethereum block, the exchange rate would increase. The rate of the increase depends on the supply APY which is determined by the ratio of supplied/borrowed capital. 

In our example, let’s say that the exchange rate from cETH to ETH increases by 0.0000000002 with each block. Assuming that the rate of increase stays the same for a month we can easily calculate the interest that can be made during that time. 

Let’s say on average we have 4 blocks per minute. This gives us the following numbers.

0.0000000002*4*60*24*30=0.00003456. Now we can add this number to the previous exchange rate. 0.021+0.00003456=0.02103456. 

If the user decides to redeem their ETH they would receive 476.19*0.0213456=~10.0165 ETH. So the user just made 0.0165 ETH in a month which is around 0.16% return on their ETH. It’s worth noting that the original amount of cETH that the user received hasn’t changed at all and only the change in the exchange rate allowed the user to redeem more ETH than was initially deposited. 

Aave uses a similar model with interest being accumulated every single block. The main difference is that aTokens’ value is pegged to the value of the underlying token at a 1:1 ratio. The interest is distributed to aToken holders directly by continuously increasing their wallet balance. aToken holders can also decide to redirect their stream of interest payments to another Ethereum address.

When it comes to borrowing, users lock their cTokens or aTokens as collateral and borrow other tokens. Collateral earns interest, but users cannot redeem or transfer assets while they are being used as collateral. 

As we mentioned earlier the amount that can be borrowed is determined by the collateral factor of the supplied assets. There is also a smart contract that looks at all the collateral across user’s account and calculates how much can be safely borrowed without getting liquidated immediately. To determine the value of collateral Compound uses its own price feed that takes prices from several highly liquid exchanges. Aave on the other hand relies on Chainlink and falls back to their own price feed if necessary. 

If a user decides to repay the borrowed amount and unlock their collateral, they also have to repay the accrued interest on their borrowed assets. The amount of accrued interest is determined by the borrow APY and it is also increased automatically with each Ethereum block. 

Risks

DeFi lending, although reducing a lot of risks associated with centralized finance, comes with its own risks.

Mainly the ever-present smart contract risks, but also quickly changing APYs. For example, during the last yield farming craze, the borrow APY on the BAT token went up to over 40%. This could cause unaware users who were not tracking Compound interest rates daily to get liquidated by having to repay more than expected in the same period of time. 

So what do you think about lending and borrowing in DeFi? What is your favourite platform? 

If you enjoyed reading this article you can also check out Finematics on Youtube and Twitter.